He also posted a Tweet that those bugs he had aren't fixed on Day One, but they were already fixed, at least.Īs for Croteam, I'd say when it comes to review copies, I hope they can do better next time, and give review copies to those that are truly trustworthy, credible, yet fair." It also falls apart when after hoping for Croteam to get better next time, he pinned a comment saying Serious Scam 4. As much as he may have some point, his review falls apart when he bashed the music and Damjan Mravunac, and regarding Hellfire and comparing her to her BFE counterpart. Then, there's Serious Sam 4 wherein he was playing on a 2-Week Old Review Build wherein it was full of problems that were definitely mostly fixed on the final build we have (and one of the Ex-Croteam External Members said it). He complained regarding some feature in Ion Fury because he cannot do it, but everyone else including Civvie can do it? Once it came out, as much as he's starting to like it, his Xen review feels rushed. He also did bashed Black Mesa especially with its level design/layout and the music before Xen came out. EA called him out on this one to correct it, but he didn't.Ī very rushed Blood Remastered review and it was still full of problems at that time. The Anthem Fiasco wherein he was Sponsored by EA, but he watermarked his review as him part of the Game Changers. He may have some points on some games, but credibility isn't his mantra especially when he praised Fallout 76 when it was still a buggy mess. "Gmanlives is not a very reliable reviewer. I'm curious why there always seems to be a great ostility towards Gman? not only in Serious Sam, but in general whenever I see classic FPS discussions whenever someone mentions Gman they say that his review of X game is garbage, or that he does not know what he says, what has he done? Here is why. Originally posted by Mr.Cipher:The Gman review was dissmanteld as trash right as the game launched.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |